Archive for the ‘Management’ Category

Launching an endorsed sub-brand 2/4

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

This is the second of 4 posts about how to combat manufactures and distributors of inferior products that are being reverse engineered and produced in China and sold at much lower prices to your existing clients. You are losing market share fast, and it is time to do something about it.

The economic strains are causing your end-users to trade down, resulting in that the mid-tier and premium brands are losing share to low-price rivals. You face a classic strategic conundrum: Do you tackle the threat head-on by reducing prices, knowing that will destroy profits in the short term and brand equity in the long term? Or do you hold the line, hope for better times to return, and in the meantime lose customers who might never come back? Given how unpalatable both of those alternatives are, you now must make a decision of how to combat manufacturers and distributors of lower priced and inferior products, to avoid losing additional market share and eroding margins.

There are four ways to battle your competition. 1) Launching a true fighter brand, 2) Launching an endorsed sub-brand, 3) Launching a co-driver sub-brand or, 4) Launching a driver sub-brand

Option Two – Endorsed Sub-Brand

Definition:

  • A sub-brand is a brand with its own name that uses the name of its parent brand in some capacity to bolster equity.
  • In the case of downscale offerings, the role of sub-brands is to help managers differentiate new offerings from the parent brand while using the parent’s equity to influence consumers.
  • The idea is both to maintain the parent’s credibility and prestige regardless of how the sub-brand performs and to protect the original brand from cannibalization.

Endorser

  • Definition: The parent brand acts as the endorser of the sub-brand. In this case, the sub-brand is the more dominant of the two, and drives end-users’ decisions to purchase the product as well as their perceptions of the experience of using the product.
  • When a company offers an endorsed sub-brand, there are three brands at work. The parent brand itself is split into two: a product brand and an organizational brand. The product brand remains as it was, a premium brand delivering a certain image and associated benefits.
  • The endorser strategy provides an excellent chance to minimize damage and reduce the threat of cannibalization to the parent brand. Keep in mind that all three brands need to be managed actively.

Examples:

Sabre B to C (John Deere)

  • John Deere’s foray into value lawn tractors provides a good illustration of an endorser relationship. John Deere was well known for making a lawn tractor that sold for approximately $2,000 through full-service specialty dealers.
  • Although the manufacturer was still able to command that price in the specialty market, volume retailers such as Sears and Home Depot had begun to serve a growing portion (around 30%) of that market, selling products at half John Deere’s prices.
  • So the company introduced an endorsed sub-brand for the value retailers: a low-cost tractor, Sabre from John Deere, that featured an inexpensive design and a different color and feel that John Deere’s other products

Medalist B to B (Hobart)

  • The Hobart Company, which makes an industrial-grade mixer for use in bakeries and restaurants.
  • Managers decided to create an inexpensive mixer for us in commercial and industrial kitchens to compete with offshore entries without damaging its flagship “gold standard” Hobart mixer line.
  • In 1996 the company introduced Medalist from the Hobart Company. Medalist mixers were lighter than Hobart mixers.
  • In addition, they were made with less costly materials and construction processes; and they had a color and logo distinct from those of the flagship Hobart.
  • In this example, The Hobart Company, has become an organizational brand that endorses the sub-brand, Medalist. Medalist itself is a new product brand. Thus the parent brand, Hobart, is separated from the sub-brand, Medalist, by the organizational brand, The Hobart Company.

Launching a pure Fighter Brand, 1/4

Friday, January 1st, 2010

We are losing market share to our new competition. What can we do to reverse the trend?

This is the first of 4 posts about how to combat manufactures and distributors of inferior products that are being reverse engineered and produced in China and sold at much lower prices to your existing clients. You are losing market share fast, and it is time to do something about it.

The economic strains are causing your end-users to trade down, resulting in that the mid-tier and premium brands are losing share to low-price rivals. You face a classic strategic conundrum: Do you tackle the threat head-on by reducing prices, knowing that will destroy profits in the short term and brand equity in the long term? Or do you hold the line, hope for better times to return, and in the meantime lose customers who might never come back? Given how unpalatable both of those alternatives are, you now must make a decision of how to combat manufacturers and distributors of lower priced and inferior products, to avoid losing additional market share and eroding margins.

There are four ways to battle your competition. 1) Launching a true fighter brand, 2) Launching an endorse sub-brand, 3) Launching a co-driver sub-brand or, 4) Launching a driver sub-brand

1) Definition of a fighter brand

  • A fighter brand is designed to combat, and ideally eliminate, low-price competitors while protecting an organization’s premium-price offerings.
  • A fighter brand, however, is not easy to introduce. First creating a new brand-building awareness, establishing perceptions of identity and quality, developing distributions channels is expensive, often prohibitively so.
  • Concerns about launching fighter brands
    • Will it cannibalize our premium offering?
    • Will it fail to bury the competition?
    • Will it lose money?
    • Will it miss the mark with end-users?
    • Will it consume too much management attention?
  • Other strategic questions to consider before launching at fighter brand
    • Determine whether another brand is truly necessary
    • Run the numbers, including what it will cost to build and sustain a new brand
    • Listen to your clients and customers, early and often
    • Reinvest in your core business and consistently calibrate between the two brands.
    • Is the market you are entering still growing

Examples of fighter brands

Saturn – B to C (General Motors) 1982

  • To combat the growing threat from fuel-efficient and affordable cars being launched into America from Japan, GM decided to launch of an “a different kind of car company” dubbed Saturn.
  • Despite the fact that Saturn won accolades for being one of the strongest brands in the U.S, Saturn proved to be a financial disaster with losses in excess of 10 billion dollars. With no budgetary discipline and so much focus on differentiating Saturn from the other GM brands, completely defeated the purpose of launching the brand in the first place.

Jetstar – (Quantas) 2004

  • To combat low-fare entrant Virgin Blue, Quantas decided to launch their own low-fare airline in 2003.
  • Since Quantas only had one single brand, it did not want to create a new brand unless it had to.
  • Exhaustive strategic sessions confirmed, however, that the Quantas brand was simply not in a position to combat Virgin Blue’s explosive growth. A fighter brand was the only option.
  • Quantas’ detailed projections showed that by offering no frills, its new airline could achieve a 20% cost advantage over its rival; thus allowing it to undercut Virgin Blue’s prices while sustaining a profit.
  • Quantum spent considerable time on focus groups across Australia and listening to their customers to validate the planned initiatives.
  • In 2004 Jetstar was launched with 14 planes flying to 14 destinations. The speed at which Jetstar attacked took Virgin Blue by surprise and knocked it off balance.
  • Jetstar took over the tourist routes that Quantas had lost money on. Because Jetstar proved profitable on those routes, it cannibalized only revenues, not profits.
  • Thanks to Jetstar, Quantas was able to refocus on its more profitable business routes and increase the frequency of its flights on those legs.
  • The subsequent boost in profits, along with Jetstar’s growing contribution, were reinvested in overhauls of Quantas’s business lounges and business class cabins – strengthening the Quantas brand and the distinction between it and Jetstar.
  • Jetstar has stopped the growth of Virgin Blue, and Quantas is now using the brand to fight other competitors in Asia and New Zealand.

Ambra – B to professional (IBM) 1992

  • To combat the growing threat from direct marketers of personal computers like Dell and Gateway and other IBM models.
  • The Ambra was sourced in Asia and marketed between 1992 and 1994 by mail order in Europe and the United States.
  • Due to lack of brand equity and distribution barriers the Ambra was cancelled 2 years after its birth.

Activeserve’s new business model takes off and the new web site is now live

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

Their Business is Your Business

iStock_000005523049SmallActiveServe is the ideal provider of business continuity solutions for South Florida businesses employing 3 to 100 business system users. Their expertise allows them to deliver superior insight, support, and service on nearly every type of technology system including communications, IT infrastructure, application hosting, and a wide variety of other answers for your business continuity needs.

In addition to the services themselves, ActiveServe also offers the unbeatable advantage of direct contact with their experts for design, decision, and implementation. In fact, they make a point of working hand in hand with business owners and/or IT managers to develop a custom business continuity blueprint… and they always make sure that technology never complicates the business side of things, and vice versa. That understanding, coupled with their specialized approach to business continuity is enough to make ActiveServe unique in the marketplace, but they can also be proud to be the first and only provider that offers a business continuity certifications program for small businesses in South Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Mario Batalli is “Superman” if you ask my husband

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Mario Batalli as the new Superman? A couple of weeks a go I went to a very well known restaurant in NY, owned by super chef (and super man if you ask my husband) Mario Batalli, and I was absolutely surprised by the fact that they are only serving filtered tap water in glasses (of course etched with information about the harmful environmental impact caused by plastic bottles from bottled water).

Secretly, a little disappointed for the lack of choices, I decided to dig and learn a bit more of the current bottled water industry situation, from the perspective of producers, companies like yours and ours, environmentalists and even city mayors and here is a summary of the findings. I invite you to be the judge:

The facts

According to the Container Recycling Institute (CRI), 96% of bottled water is sold in single-size polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles, which, because they are frequently consumed “on the go,” end up in city trash cans rather than recycling bins.

CRI estimates some 4 billion PET bottles end up in the waste stream, costing cities some $70 million a year in cleanup and landfill costs.

The Food & Water Water Watch claims that more than 17 million barrels of oil (enough to fuel 1M cars for a year) are needed to produce the plastic water bottles sold in the US annually.

Furthermore, there is the environmental cost of manufacturing and then transporting the nearly 100 billion liters of bottled water each year. Stores are filled with bottled water from all over the country and even the world (please also consider the cost of fuel required to bring these bottles from Europe or even other parts of North America to our local stores)

Despite these facts, not so long ago bottled water was bubbling and have had swelled 59% to 5.1 billion by the end of 2008, reason why producers are currently seriously blaming not only the economic downturn but also the (according to them) misguided and confusing criticism of activist groups and a handful of mayors that have presented misinformation and subjective criticism as facts[1].

The IBWA’s argument is that Instead of pitting bottled water against tap water, bottled water should be seen as an alternative to soda and other sugary drinks consumed outside the home. In the consulted ad the association quotes statistics saying that in the USA70% of beverages are consumed from a can or bottle, “a result of our 24/7 on-the-go society, so actually ideally the drink in everyone’s purse, backpack, and lunch box should be water.

As for recycling, the IBWA declare that bottled water companies have done their part to reduce the amount of PET resin in bottles by 40 percent over the last five years. Despite the number of bottles that end up in landfills, however, PET bottles represent only a third of 1 percent (.0033) of all trash.

How is America reacting to this?

Without doubt now more than ever governments, activists, and the media have become adept at holding companies to account for the social consequences of their activities. Myriad organizations rank companies on the performance of their corporate social responsibility (CSR), and, despite sometimes questionable methodologies, these rankings attract considerable publicity. As a result, CSR has emerged as an inescapable priority for business leaders in every country and of course the “no consumption” of bottled water constitutes an “easy” and quick step towards this big goal.

To complicate the situation even more for the bottled water producers, many influential cities and mayors in the US (who probably have the most to gain from promoting municipal water) have been getting into the act and are even issuing executive orders to cancel the city’s purchasing contracts for bottled water, mandating instead that cities departments rely on tap water.

Our opinion

We are proud to be a forward-thinking and environmentally responsible business, so we’ll have to go with Mario’s approach, we actually suggest that you stop for a moment and consider that bottled water regulations only require the water to be as safe as tap water, meaning that the idea of paying for water to be bottled and then flown or shipped thousands of miles begins to appear quite absurd, and a very poor use of our natural resources.

What do you think?

 


[1] As claimed in the New York Times ad published on August 2009 by the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

R&R at The Fleming in Hong Kong.

Monday, August 10th, 2009
A 46 segment × 3 exposure HDR panorama of the ...
Image via Wikipedia

Sometimes you can find new opportunities within an arm’s length. The Fleming Hotel in Hong Kong did just that. Considering that there is a huge demographic of male single travelers whom travel for business, why not create some special rooms for them.

Think about it. You have been working hard all day, hit numerous meetings, you have an early flight out, and you want some R&R. Want to play some mini golf or snipe the head of an enemy in Call of Duty (PS3). This hotel has designed the “His Space”

With a little effort you can segment and provide a specialty service for your existing clientele. Would love to hear other stories of people or companies who have elevated their service segment for their key clientele.

Website: www.thefleming.com
Found On: www.springwise.com

Seacapital Group – sustainable resources, cultivated opportunity

Sunday, July 19th, 2009

logoKompani Group has added SeaCapital group to its roster of clients. SeaCapital is the first private equity firm dedicated solely to investments across the sustainable seafood value chain. Their mission is to advance sustainable and safe seafood resources by investing in companies and technologies that promote innovation and responsible development.

SeaCapital’s focus is to invest in growth-oriented companies across the seafood value chain in partnership with exceptional management teams. SeaCapital focuses on organizations with considerable growth prospects, and works closely with management to create and execute an expansion plans that encompass organic growth and strategic acquisitions.

Their principals collectively have more than 100 years of seafood and finance industry experience including a distinguished track record of working with management teams to build companies into larger and more deeply integrated organizations. The investments will be made solely in the sustainable seafood value chain where their significant experience in operations, strategy, and corporate finance will add significant shareholder value. Since 2003, the Seacapital team has completed eleven strategic acquisitions and divestitures with an aggregate value of more than $120 million.

Louis Moinet and Primetime Race Group

Saturday, July 18th, 2009
Louis Moinet Clock owned by King George IV
Image via Wikipedia

For the 2009 American Le Mans Series, Louis Moinet became the official timepiece for the racing team Primetime Race Group’s #11 Dodge Viper. The racing team entered its second full season in the American Le Mans Series with owner and driver Joel Feinberg and his teammate Chris Hall at the wheel. The car it the only Dodge Viper Competition Coupe in the Grand Touring (GT2) class of the competition. Visit www.primetimeracegroup.comfor additional schedule on upcoming races. Louis Moinet timepieces have been worn by distinctive figures the likes of Thomas Jefferson, Napoleon and King George IV. The company limts its production to only a thousand watches every year, ensuring its exclusivity.

Primetime Race Group

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

Kompani Group is proud to announce that we have added Primetime Race Group and Joel Feinberg to our client roster.

Most will find Joel to be a young, athletic, handsome man with a with a passion for success which is most certainly enviable if not contagious. Some might view him as quiet, shy, possibly aloof. But once he begins to open up about his life, you quickly find a more passionate and enthusiastic entrepreneur. Joel is what some refer to as a modern day “mover and shaker.”

Coming out of high school, Joel decided to embark on a career playing golf professionally. After six years on the circuit, he hung up his clubs to give significant time and energy to various business endeavors including Capital Real Estate Group, followed by the startup of SPORTS TALK 790 AM – THE TICKET, Primetime Media Group and Primetime Race Group.

Joel took on mountain biking, becoming a nationally ranked cross-country biker. Rising to the pinnacle of the sport Joel competed in what was known as, “The toughest mountain bike race on the planet,” a three day, three hundred mile race through the mountains and rainforest of Costa Rica. Joel also played ice hockey on a men’s league based in South Florida.

Primetime Race Group is Joel’s most recent business venture, a Florida based company specializing in professional motorsports as well as sports marketing. Primetime currently campaigns a Dodge Viper in the GT2 class of the American Le Mans Series (ALMS) which is the most prominent road race series in North America and an Elan DP02 in the International Motor Sports Association (IMSA) Lites Series, a support series to the ALMS. With 10 trips to the IMSA Lites podium, 11 top 5 finishes in 2008, and 2 first and 3 other podium finishes through June of 2009 it is clear to see that Primetime is a top contender.

Joel’s passion for winning has become the foundation of his success!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Game over for GameStop?

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

Game over for GameStop? GameStop’s main revenue source is through the sale of those shiny little discs. What will happen when the developers exclusively release their games via the console’s online marketplaces?  People will less likely go to a location to buy a physical item. Yes, it’s great to get the little booklet, and some of those exclusive packs have some cool swag. But we find it much more convenient to download the games, which actually also results in increased sales of add-ons for the distributors.

This leads us to our next observation. In a recent article that we read about the reported sales of the game, Crackdown (1.5 million), the developer mentions that they only broke even and in actuality sold about 2-3 million copies. What happened to the extra revenue? GameStop and other retailers made money on the used games. I believe the developers should have a cut of that money. We can argue that when you buy a car, the manufacturer does not see residuals on future sales of that car. A game is digital and remains intact, the only depreciation would be on the packaging or the disc itself.

So back to the point at hand. GameStop will eventually be in the same boat with the music business going from record, to cassette, to CD, to online download. How could GameStop reinvent itself?

  • Maybe it will become an antique dealer of old games and consoles. (which is somewhat does now)
  • A place that only sells the consoles, and peripherals.
  • Stand alone kiosk that resells the games onto a portable storage device. The kiosk being placed strategically in malls, convenience stores, etc.

What would you do if your industry changed as fast as GameStop’s industry? Do you have a contingency plan in place that will allow you to evolve just in time to save your business? Things to ponder! Sometimes the surest things have a way to undermine themselves. Don’t grow stale with your current products or services. Observe and always look for the next frontier in your industry, or take advantage of your perfected processes and look to apply those processes in an entirely new industry. Always have a plan ready for how to reinvent yourself when and if your find yourself swimming against the current.

Invest in your own business ideas, but keep your current job!

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Why invest on Wall Street when you can invest in your own business ideas, without giving up your current job?

Kompani Group’s business model offers a very effective “breeding” platform for ideas that are born by seasoned executives who are currently enjoying seniority and well paid positions at larger national - and international corporations.

Just because you are a senior executive at a Fortune 1000 company doesn’t mean that you don’t have great ideas for new business ventures that fall outside the core business of your current employers business model, and instead of just allowing those great ideas collect dust over the years or see someone else a few years later build a thriving business based on the same ideas, you can now take those ideas to Kompani Group who in return for a performance fee and an equity stake in the new business will allow your conceptual ideas to “take flight”.